Bugscope InfrastructureThe unique opportunity that Bugscope provides to students and teachers is possible through a supporting infrastructure of people and technology. Although this is normally available to scientists, it is rarely offered to K-12 classrooms (Potter, et al., 1999). An example of how a classroom participates using the Bugscope infrastructure follows:
People behind BugscopeThe Bugscope project has no full-time staff. The project is a collaboration of over a dozen faculty, staff, and students at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and the University Laboratory High School.11 The project team expertise includes biology, electron microscopy, entomology, imaging, instructional design, remote scientific instrumentation, software engineering, visualization, and web design and development. A critical subgroup of the project is the operations team that supports remote classrooms. Technology behind BugscopeThere are three components of the technology infrastructure: an environmental scanning electron microscope, the interactive remote microscopy application (irma) software to access and control the microscope (Grosser and Kisseberth, 1999), and the project web site, with a variety of resources for the classrooms.12 A session web page for each classroom allows students and teachers to utilize the supporting infrastructure of people and technology for their project. Environmental scanning electron microscopeMost optical microscopes (what are commonly termed "light microscopes" or "dissecting microscopes") that are available in schools today use a light source to illuminate specimens that are magnified using glass lenses. The highest magnification attainable with any light microscope is approximately 1000x. The highest magnification capability of most classroom light microscopes is more likely to be in the range of 400 to 600x. The typical dissecting microscope magnifies to about 20x. Light microscopes were not intended for three-dimensional imaging, and dissecting microscopes were designed for it but have limited magnification capabilities. In addition, the typical K-12 classroom microscope rarely provides the ability to save an image of the chosen feature or specimen. The environmental scanning electron microscope is capable of imaging at much higher magnification, and provides much better resolution and depth of field than any light microscope.13 The ESEM has a magnification range from about 17x to over 500,000x.14 For this project, however, the highest magnification available to students is less than 30,000x. Scientists at the university from several disciplines, such as biology, geology, and materials science, use the ESEM for their research. Interactive remote microscopy application softwareThe irma software is a web based system for remote access and control of the microscope. The main components of the irma software are the image observer and the scope controller (see Figure 2).15 The observer automatically displays the current image that has been acquired by the microscope. Although the observer is primarily a passive application, it has a few controls that students can manipulate. For example, a student can classify an image as a high quality image by clicking on the 'Mark Image' button. The controller provides the capability to manipulate parameters of the microscope, such as magnification, focus, and contrast, remotely. The irma software also allows several classrooms to simultaneously and independently access and control the microscope. Thus, there can be any number of observers and several controllers active at one time.
Bugscope web siteThe Bugscope project web site has been designed to provide teachers (and their students) easy access to a variety of resources.16 Among these are the teacher application, teacher information, classroom session information, and image database. Teacher application. Teachers interested in participating in the project submit their applications online with information about themselves, their school, and computer facilities available to them.17 A critical component of the application is the project proposal where the teachers describe their interest in Bugscope and specific classroom project plans.18 Teacher information. A resource web page has been developed to assist teachers in submitting their applications, as well as in planning their classroom sessions. This page includes information related to arthropod-related activities and curricular materials, specimen preparation guidelines, proposal guidelines, and model proposals for different grade levels. Classroom session information
To give a scheduled classroom access and control of the microscope, a web page specific to their session is created (see Figure 3). The session page provides students and teachers a straightforward approach to running the microscope using the controller and the observer. A chat program may also be initiated to allow for communication between the classroom and the operations team. The session page lists preset stage and magnification positions on the specimen (e.g., praying mantis) submitted by a classroom from Tennessee, for instance. The presets, which are chosen by the operations team, have proven to be helpful to students at all levels in getting started with their sessions. A preset is intended to help students explore a particular feature of their insect specimen. Teachers often request preset features that they would like their students to study or start with. The session page also provides pointers to appropriate help documentation. Database
All of the images acquired by the classrooms are automatically stored in a database. These images are immediately accessible to the classrooms, as well as to anyone interested in the sessions, through the database interface (see Figure 4). The images are stored with associated acquisition parameters, such as magnification, along with any annotations or comments made by the students and teachers about their acquired images. In order to achieve scalability and sustainability for the Bugscope project, it has been necessary to automate many project administration tasks, such as the teacher application review. For example, once a teacher submits an online application through the web site, a proposal number (e.g., 1999-016) is automatically assigned to the application. The application is immediately archived into a database on the web site and made available to the project team for critique. A team member can also review the critiques submitted by others for a given application. Teacher applications, especially the project proposals, are rated on a 5-point Likert scale in terms of their overall quality, scientific interest, innovation, suitable grade level, and uniqueness. In addition, a team member critiquing applications can also write comments for a given application. The critiques by team members on an application are automatically synthesized, and the results are immediately available. Without such automation capabilities, it would be difficult to sustain the project in the long term. |
|||||
|
|||||